In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Measurement imprecision in vertebral morphometry of spinal radiographs obtained in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study: consequences for the identification of prevalent and incident deformities

Weber, K; Lunt, M; Gowin, W; Lauermann, T; Armbrecht, G; Wieland, E; Leb, G; O'Neill, T W; Felsenberg, D; Reeve, J

Br.J.Radiol. 1999;72(862):957-966.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally

Abstract

Several algorithms are currently in use for evaluating vertebral deformities from plain lateral radiographs of the lumbar and thoracic spine. However, the effects of measurement imprecision as well as uncertainties over image magnification on the correct identification of prevalent and incident vertebral deformities with these algorithms has been little studied. In a pilot study for the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS), plain radiographs were submitted to a single central evaluating centre for measurement of vertebral height from T4 to L4. The thoracic and lumbar spines were imaged on separate films, and we have assessed the precision of measurement of vertebral heights and height ratios. The standard deviation of the differences between films of each of three height measurements ranged from 1.1 to 1.2 mm. A two-stage strategy for identifying incident deformities was devised. This required that the vertebra be a prevalent deformity at the time of the second radiograph and also that at least one of the vertebral ratios should have changed significantly since the first radiograph. The second stage removed all but two of the 18 vertebrae flagged positive in the first stage but not considered to be certain incident fractures by clinical reading of the radiographs

Bibliographic metadata

Content type:
Publication type:
Publication form:
Published date:
Journal title:
Volume:
72
Issue:
862
Start page:
957
End page:
966
Related website(s):
  • Related website PM:10673947
General notes:
  • UI - 20138902 DA - 20000302 IS - 0007-1285 LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Multicenter Study CY - ENGLAND JC - B28 SB - AIM SB - IM
Access state:
Active

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
uk-ac-man-scw:78886
Created by:
Ingram, Mary
Created:
12th April, 2010, 14:26:00
Last modified by:
Ingram, Mary
Last modified:
23rd August, 2012, 20:10:20

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.