In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Naming versus matching and the stability of unique hues

Panorgias, A; Kulikowski, J J; Parry, N R A; McKeefry, D J; Murray, I J

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2010;30(5):553-559.

Access to files

Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

Full-text held externally


It is known that there is a distortion of hue and saturation in the peripheral visual field. In a previous study, when an asymmetric matching paradigm was used, four hues in the blue, red, yellow and green regions of colour space were unchanged and these were referred to as peripherally invariant (Parry et al., J Opt Soc Am A, 23, 2006, 1586). Three of these invariant hues were similar to unique blue, red and yellow. However, for most observers there was a marked difference between unique and invariant green. To investigate this apparent paradox, we have measured unique hues using a range of eccentricities and colourimetric purities. An asymmetric matching and a 4-AFC paradigm were used to establish peripherally invariant and unique hues, respectively. In the asymmetric matching task the observer matched a peripheral spot with a para-foveal spot, for 24 different hues at 18 degrees eccentricity. In the 4-AFC paradigm, 41 hues were presented 20 times at three purities (0.5, 0.75 and 1.0) and three eccentricities (18 degrees, 10 degrees and 1 degrees). The observer had to name the hues as red, blue, green or yellow. Unique hues were found to be constant with eccentricity and purity. The unique green, established with 4-AFC, was found to differ from the invariant green, determined using the matching task. However, red, blue and yellow invariant hues correspond well with unique hues. The data suggest that different mechanisms mediate the matching of green compared with the identification of unique hues. This is similar to the difference between detection and discrimination of spectral stimuli: the detection process is dominated by the cone opponent mechanisms and is most sensitive, whereas more central processes, serving unique hues, influence discrimination.

Bibliographic metadata

Type of resource:
Content type:
Published date:
Start page:
End page:
Digital Object Identifier:
ISI Accession Number:
Related website(s):
  • Related website <Go to ISI>://WOS:000281285500016
General notes:
  • Times Cited: 1 20th Biennial Symposium of the International-Colour-Vision-Society JUL 24-28, 2009 Univ Minho, Braga, PORTUGAL Int Colour Vis Soc
Access state:

Institutional metadata

University researcher(s):

Record metadata

Manchester eScholar ID:
Created by:
Parry, Neil
30th March, 2012, 12:10:44
Last modified by:
Parry, Neil
Last modified:
13th August, 2012, 19:00:47

Can we help?

The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.