In April 2016 Manchester eScholar was replaced by the University of Manchester’s new Research Information Management System, Pure. In the autumn the University’s research outputs will be available to search and browse via a new Research Portal. Until then the University’s full publication record can be accessed via a temporary portal and the old eScholar content is available to search and browse via this archive.

Related resources

Full-text held externally

University researcher(s)

    Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer.

    Shaw, Alice T; Kim, Dong-Wan; Nakagawa, Kazuhiko; Seto, Takashi; Crinó, Lucio; Ahn, Myung-Ju; De Pas, Tommaso; Besse, Benjamin; Solomon, Benjamin J; Blackhall, Fiona; Wu, Yi-Long; Thomas, Michael; O'Byrne, Kenneth J; Moro-Sibilot, Denis; Camidge, D Ross; Mok, Tony; Hirsh, Vera; Riely, Gregory J; Iyer, Shrividya; Tassell, Vanessa; Polli, Anna; Wilner, Keith D; Jänne, Pasi A

    The New England journal of medicine. 2013;.

    Access to files

    Full-text and supplementary files are not available from Manchester eScholar. Full-text is available externally using the following links:

    Full-text held externally

    Abstract

    Background In single-group studies, chromosomal rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) have been associated with marked clinical responses to crizotinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting ALK. Whether crizotinib is superior to standard chemotherapy with respect to efficacy is unknown. Methods We conducted a phase 3, open-label trial comparing crizotinib with chemotherapy in 347 patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive lung cancer who had received one prior platinum-based regimen. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral treatment with crizotinib (250 mg) twice daily or intravenous chemotherapy with either pemetrexed (500 mg per square meter of body-surface area) or docetaxel (75 mg per square meter) every 3 weeks. Patients in the chemotherapy group who had disease progression were permitted to cross over to crizotinib as part of a separate study. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Results The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months in the crizotinib group and 3.0 months in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for progression or death with crizotinib, 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.64; P<0.001). The response rates were 65% (95% CI, 58 to 72) with crizotinib, as compared with 20% (95% CI, 14 to 26) with chemotherapy (P<0.001). An interim analysis of overall survival showed no significant improvement with crizotinib as compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio for death in the crizotinib group, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.54; P=0.54). Common adverse events associated with crizotinib were visual disorder, gastrointestinal side effects, and elevated liver aminotransferase levels, whereas common adverse events with chemotherapy were fatigue, alopecia, and dyspnea. Patients reported greater reductions in symptoms of lung cancer and greater improvement in global quality of life with crizotinib than with chemotherapy. Conclusions Crizotinib is superior to standard chemotherapy in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangement. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00932893 .).

    Institutional metadata

    University researcher(s):

    Record metadata

    Manchester eScholar ID:
    uk-ac-man-scw:198455
    Created by:
    Blackhall, Fiona
    Created:
    19th June, 2013, 09:34:35
    Last modified by:
    Blackhall, Fiona
    Last modified:
    26th October, 2015, 16:23:35

    Can we help?

    The library chat service will be available from 11am-3pm Monday to Friday (excluding Bank Holidays). You can also email your enquiry to us.